Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787
by James Madison
Friday, August 24
“Strike out so much of the 4th Sect: as was referred to the Committee and insert-”The migration or importation of such persons as the several States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Legislature prior to the year 1800, but a tax or duty may be imposed on such migration or importation at a rate not exceeding the average of the duties laid on imports.”
“The 5 Sect: to remain as in the Report”
“The 6 Sect to be stricken out”
Mr. BUTLER, according to notice, moved that clause 1st. sect. 1. of Art VII, as to the discharge of debts, be reconsidered tomorrow. He dwelt on the division of opinion concerning the domestic debts, and the different pretensions of the different classes of holders.
Genl. PINKNEY 2ded. him.
Mr. RANDOLPH wished for a reconsideration in order to better the expression, and to provide for the case of the State debts as is done by Congress.
On the question for reconsidering
N. H. no. Mas: ay. Cont. ay N. J. ay. Pena. absent. Del. ay Md. no. Va. ay. N. C. absent, S. C. ay. Geo. ay. 3-and tomorrow assigned for the reconsideration.
Sect: 2 & 3 of art: IX 4 being taken up,
Mr. RUTLIDGE said this provision for deciding controversies between the States was necessary under the Confederation, but will be rendered unnecessary by the National Judiciary now to be established, and moved to strike it out.
Docr. JOHNSON 2ded. the Motion
Mr. WILLIAMSON was for postponing instead of striking out, in order to consider whether this might not be a good provision, in cases where the Judiciary were interested or too closely connected with the parties.
Mr. GHORUM had doubts as to striking out. The Judges might be connected with the States being parties-He was inclined to think the mode proposed in the clause would be more satisfactory than to refer such cases to the Judiciary.
On the Question for postponing the 2d. & 3d. Section, it passed in the negative
N. H. ay. Masts. no. Cont. no N. J. no. Pena. abst. Del. no. Md. no. Va. no. N. C. ay. S. C. no. Geo. ay.5
Mr. WILSON urged the striking out, the Judiciary being a better provision.
Art. X. sect. 1.9 “The executive power of the U. S. shall be vested in a single person. His stile shall be “The President of the U. S. of America” and his title shall be “His Excellency.” He shall be elected by ballot by the Legislature. He shall hold his office during the term of seven years; but shall not be elected a second time.
On the question for vesting the power in a single person. It was agreed to nem: con: So also on the Stile and title.
Mr. RUTLIDGE moved to insert “joint” before the word “ballot,” as the most convenient mode of electing.
Mr. SHERMAN objected to it as depriving the States represented in the Senate of the negative intended them in that house.
Mr. GHORUM said it was wrong to be considering at every turn whom the Senate would represent. The public good was the true object to be kept in view. Great delay and confusion would ensue if the two Houses shd. vote separately, each having a negative on the choice of the other.
Mr. DAYTON. It might be well for those not to consider how the Senate was constituted, whose interest it was to keep it out of sight. -If the amendment should be agreed to, a joint10 ballot would in fact give the appointment to one House. He could never agree to the clause with such an amendment. There could be no doubt of the two Houses separately concurring in the same person for President. The importance & necessity of the case would ensure a concurrence.
Mr. CARROL moved to strike out “by the Legislature” and insert “by the people.”
Mr. WILSON 2ded. him & on the question
N. H. no. Massts. no. Cont. no. N. J. no. Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. no. Va. no N. C. no. S. C. no. Geo. no.11
Mr. WILSON urged the reasonableness of giving the larger States a larger share of the appointment, and the danger of delay from a disagreement of the two Houses. He remarked also that the Senate had peculiar powers balancing the advantage given by a joint balot in this case to the other branch of the Legislature.
Mr. LANGDON. This general officer ought to be elected by the joint & general voice. In N. Hampshire the mode of separate votes by the two Houses was productive of great difficulties. The negative of the Senate would hurt the feelings of the man elected by the votes of the other branch. He was for inserting “joint” tho’ unfavorable to N. Hampshire as a small State.
Mr. WILSON remarked that as the President of the Senate was to be President of the U. S. that Body in cases of vacancy might have an interest in throwing dilatory obstacles in the way, if its separate concurrence should be required.
Mr. MADISON. If the amendment be agreed to the rule of voting will give to the largest State, compared with the smallest, an influence as 4 to 1 only, altho the population is as 10 to 1. This surely can not be unreasonable as the President is to act for the people not for the States. The President of the Senate also is to be occasionally President of the U. S. and by his negative alone can make 3/4 of the other branch necessary to the passage of a law. This is another advantage enjoyed by the Senate.
On the question for inserting “joint,” it passed in the affirmative
N. H. ay. Masts. ay. Ct. no. N. J. no. Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. no Va. ay. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. no.13
N. H. no. Mas. no. Ct. ay. N. J. ay. Pa. no. Del. ay. Md. ay. Va. no. N. C. no. S. C. no. Geo. ay.15
Mr. PINKNEY moved to insert after the word “Legislature” the words “to which election a majority of the votes of the members present shall be required” &
On this question, it passed in the affirmative
N. H. ay. Mas. ay. Ct. ay. N. J. no. Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. ay. Va. ay. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay.16
Mr. READ moved “that in case the numbers for the two highest in votes should be equal, then the President of the Senate shall have an additional casting vote,” which was disagreed to by a general negative.
Mr. Govr. MORRIS opposed the election of the President by the Legislature. He dwelt on the danger of rendering the Executive uninterested in maintaining the rights of his Station, as leading to Legislative tyranny. If the Legislature have the Executive depedent on them, they can perpetuate & support their usurpations by the influence of tax-gatherers & other officers, by fleets armies &c. Cabal & corruption are attached to that mode of election: so also17 is ineligibility a second time. Hence the Executive is interested in Courting popularity in the Legislature by sacrificing his Executive Rights; & then he can go into that Body, after the expiration of his Executive office, and enjoy there the fruits of his policy. To these considerations he added that rivals would be continually intrigueing to oust the President from his place. To guard against all these evils he moved that the President “shall be chosen by Electors to be chosen by the People of the several States”
Mr. CARROL 2ded. him & on the question it passed in the negative.
N. H. no. Mas. no. Ct. ay. N. J. ay. Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. no. Va. ay. N. C. no. S. C. no. Geo. no.18
Mr. DAYTON moved to postpone the consideration of the two last clauses of Sect. 1. art. X. which was disagreed to without a count of the States.
Mr. BROOME moved to refer the two clauses to a Committee of a member from each State, & on the question, it failed the States being equally divided
N. H. no. Mas. no. Ct. divd. N. J. ay. Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. ay. Va. ay. N. C. no. S. C. no. Geo. no.19
On the question taken on the first part of Mr. Govr. Morris’s Motion towit “shall be chosen by electors” as an abstract question, it failed the States being equally divided.
N. H. no. Mas. abst. Ct. divd. N. Jersey ay. Pa. ay. Del. ay. Md. divd. Va. ay. N. C. no. S. C. no. Geo. no.20
The consideration of the remaining clauses of Sect 1. art X. was then postponed till tomorrow at the instance of the Deputies of New Jersey.
Sect. 2. Art: X21 being taken up, the word information was transposed & inserted after “Legislature”
On motion of Mr. Govr. MORRIS, “he may” was struck out, & “and” inserted before “recommend” in clause 2d. sect 2d. art: X. in order to make it the duty of the President to recommend, & thence prevent umbrage or cavil at his doing it.
Mr. SHERMAN objected to the sentence “and shall appoint officers in all cases not otherwise provided for by22 this Constitution.” He admitted it to be proper that many officers in the Executive Department should be so appointed- but contended that many ought not, as general officers in the army in time of peace &c. Herein lay the corruption in G. Britain. If the Executive can model the army, he may set up an absolute Government; taking advantage of the close of a war and an army commanded by his creatures. James 2d. was not obeyed by his officers because they had been appointed by his predecessors not by himself. He moved to insert “or by law” after the word “Constitution.”
On Motion of Mr. MADISON “officers” was truck out and “to offices” inserted, in order to obviate doubts that he might appoint officers without a previous creation of the offices by the Legislature.
On the question for inserting “or by law as moved by Mr. Sherman
N. H. no. Mas. no. Ct. ay. N. J. no. Pena. no. Del. no. Md. no. Va. no. N. C. absent. S. C. no. Geo. no.23
Mr. DICKINSON moved to strike out the words “and shall appoint to offices in all cases not otherwise provided for by this Constitution” and insert-”and shall appoint to all offices established by this Constitution, except in cases herein otherwise provided for, and to all offices which may hereafter be created by law.”
Mr. RANDOLPH observed that the power of appointments was a formidable one both in the Executive & Legislative hands-and suggested whether the Legislature should not be left at liberty to refer appointments in some cases, to some State authority.
Mr. WILSON- If this be agreed to it will soon be a standing instruction from the State Legislatures to pass no law creating offices, unless the appts. be referred to them.
Mr. SHERMAN objected to “Legislatures” in the motion, which was struck out by consent of the movers.
Mr. Govr. MORRIS. This would be putting it in the power of the States to say, “You shall be viceroys but we will be viceroys over you”-
The Motion was negatived without a Count of the States-
Ordered unanimously that the order respecting the adjournment at 4 OClock be repealed, & that in future the House assemble at 10 OC. & adjourn at 3 OC. 26
3 In the transcript the vote reads: “Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware, Virginia, Southe Carolina, Geogia, aye-7; New Hampshire, Maryland, no-2; Pennsylvania, North Carolina, absent.” Return to text
5 In the transcript the vote reads: “New Hampshire, North Carolina, Georgia, aye-3; Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, South Carolina, no-7; Pennsylvania, absennt.” Return to text
8 In the transcript the vote reads: “New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Southe Carolina, aye-8; North Carolina, Georgia, no-2; Pennsylvania, absent.” Return to text
11 In the transcript the vote reads: “Pennsylvania, Delaware, aye-2; 1New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, no-9.” Return to text
13 In the transcript the vote reads: “New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, aye-7; Connecticut, New Jersey, Maryland, Georgia, no-4.” Return to text
15 In the transcript the vote reads: “Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Georgia, aye-5; New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, no-6.” Return to text
16 In the transcript the vote reads: “New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, georgia, aye-10; New Jersey, no-1.” Return to text
18 In the transcript the vote reads: “Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Virginia, aye-5; New Hmapshire, Massachusetts, MAryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Geogia, no-6.” Return to text
19 In the transcrit the vote reads:”New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, aye-5; New Hmapshire, Massachusetts, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, no-5; Connecticut, devided.” Return to text
20 In the transcript the vote reads: “New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Virginia, aye-4; New Hampshire, North Carolina, South Carolina, georgia, no- 4; Connecticut, Maryland, divided; Massachusetts, absent.” Return to text
23 In the transcript the vote reads: “Connecticut, aye-1; New Hampshire, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, South Carolina, Georgia, no-9; North Carolina, absent.” Return to text
25 In the transcript the vote reads: “Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, Georgia, aye-6; New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Delaware, South Carolina, no-4; North Carolina, absent.” Return to text