/

Document

Jefferson to Coles: The Difficulties of Ending Slavery
August 12, 1814
Edited and introduced by
Thomas Jefferson (1743–1826) and Edward Coles (1786–1868) shared some things in common. Both were aristocratic Virginians with luxurious lifestyles maintained by the enslaved African Americans they inherited from their fathers. They both denounced slavery in their writings. They differed, however, on how to end the brutal system. In 1814, they also differed in age. Jefferson was in his 70s, while Coles was only 28. Jefferson believed he had pushed as hard as possible against the system the men inherited; Coles was determined not to live his entire life holding people in slavery. Coles wrote Jefferson in July of 1814 urging the former president “to exert your knowledge and influence, in devising, and getting into operation, some plan for the gradual emancipation of Slavery” in Virginia. Coles argued that Jefferson was the logical choice “to put into complete practice those hallowed principles contained in that renowned Declaration, of which you were the immortal author.” In his response, Jefferson argued that his views on slavery were “public knowledge.” He believed that the “love of justice and the love of country plead equally for the cause of these people;” however, he also believed those opposed to slavery were in the minority. Now in his retirement, Jefferson told Coles he could not lead the fight. Plus, his previous support for emancipation taught him that its proponents risked becoming social outcasts, a risk he was unwilling to take. Jefferson was discouraged that more young people did not adopt Coles’ position. Still, he advised the young man not to free his enslaved people. Instead, he counseled Coles to speak out against the system via the “medium of writing and conversation,” as a means of demonstrating his Christianity.

Document

DEAR SIR,– Your favour of July 31, was duly received, and was read with peculiar pleasure. The sentiments breathed through the whole do honor to both the head and heart of the writer. Mine on the subject of slavery of negroes have long since been in possession of the public, and time has only served to give them stronger root. The love of justice and the love of country plead equally the cause of these people, and it is a moral reproach to us that they should have pleaded it so long in vain, and should have produced not a single effort, nay I fear not much serious willingness to relieve them & ourselves from our present condition of moral & political reprobation. From those of the former generation who were in the fulness of age when I came into public life, which was while our controversy with England was on paper only, I soon saw that nothing was to be hoped. Nursed and educated in the daily habit of seeing the degraded condition, both bodily and mental, of those unfortunate beings, not reflecting that that degradation was very much the work of themselves & their fathers, few minds have yet doubted but that they were as legitimate subjects of property as their horses and cattle. The quiet and monotonous course of colonial life has been disturbed by no alarm, and little reflection on the value of liberty. And when alarm was taken at an enterprise on their own, it was not easy to carry them to the whole length of the principles which they invoked for themselves. In the first or second session of the Legislature after I became a member, I drew to this subject the attention of Col. Bland,1 one of the oldest, ablest, & most respected members, and he undertook to move for certain moderate extensions of the protection of the laws to these people. I seconded his motion, and, as a younger member, was more spared in the debate; but he was denounced as an enemy of his country, & was treated with the grossest indecorum. From an early stage of our revolution other & more distant duties were assigned to me, so that from that time till my return from Europe in 1789, and I may say till I returned to reside at home in 1809, I had little opportunity of knowing the progress of public sentiment here on this subject. I had always hoped that the younger generation receiving their early impressions after the flame of liberty had been kindled in every breast, & had become as it were the vital spirit of every American, that the generous temperament of youth, analogous to the motion of their blood, and above the suggestions of avarice, would have sympathized with oppression wherever found, and proved their love of liberty beyond their own share of it. But my intercourse with them, since my return has not been sufficient to ascertain that they had made towards this point the progress I had hoped. Your solitary but welcome voice is the first which has brought this sound to my ear; and I have considered the general silence which prevails on this subject as indicating an apathy unfavorable to every hope. Yet the hour of emancipation is advancing, in the march of time. It will come; and whether brought on by the generous energy of our own minds; or by the bloody process of St Domingo2, excited and conducted by the power of our present enemy, if once stationed permanently within our Country, and offering asylum & arms to the oppressed, is a leaf of our history not yet turned over.

As to the method by which this difficult work is to be effected, if permitted to be done by ourselves, I have seen no proposition so expedient on the whole, as that as emancipation of those born after a given day, and of their education and expatriation after a given age. This would give time for a gradual extinction of that species of labour & substitution of another, and lessen the severity of the shock which an operation so fundamental cannot fail to produce. For men probably of any color, but of this color we know, brought from their infancy without necessity for thought or forecast, are by their habits rendered as incapable as children of taking care of themselves, and are extinguished promptly wherever industry is necessary for raising young. In the mean time they are pests in society by their idleness, and the depredations to which this leads them. Their amalgamation with the other color produces a degradation to which no lover of his country, no lover of excellence in the human character can innocently consent.

I am sensible of the partialities with which you have looked towards me as the person who should undertake this salutary but arduous work. But this, my dear sir, is like bidding old Priam to buckle the armour of Hector “trementibus aequo humeris et inutile ferruncingi.”3 No, I have overlived the generation with which mutual labors & perils begat mutual confidence and influence. This enterprise is for the young; for those who can follow it up, and bear it through to its consummation. It shall have all my prayers, & these are the only weapons of an old man. But in the mean time are you right in abandoning this property, and your country with it? I think not. My opinion has ever been that, until more can be done for them, we should endeavor, with those whom fortune has thrown on our hands, to feed and clothe them well, protect them from all ill usage, require such reasonable labor only as is performed voluntarily by freemen, & be led by no repugnancies to abdicate them, and our duties to them. The laws do not permit us to turn them loose, if that were for their good: and to commute them for other property is to commit them to those whose usage of them we cannot control. I hope then, my dear sir, you will reconcile yourself to your country and its unfortunate condition; that you will not lessen its stock of sound disposition by withdrawing your portion from the mass. That, on the contrary you will come forward in the public councils, become the missionary of this doctrine truly christian; insinuate & inculcate it softly but steadily, through the medium of writing and conversation; associate others in your labors, and when the phalanx is formed, bring on and press the proposition perseveringly until its accomplishment. It is an encouraging observation that no good measure was ever proposed, which, if duly pursued, failed to prevail in the end. We have proof of this in the history of the endeavors in the English parliament to suppress that very trade which brought this evil on us.4 And you will be supported by the religious precept, “be not weary in well-doing.”5 That your success may be as speedy & complete, as it will be of honorable & immortal consolation to yourself, I shall as fervently and sincerely pray as I assure you of my great friendship and respect.

Source

“Thomas Jefferson to Edward Coles, 25 August 1814,” Founders Online, National Archives, https://teachingamericanhistory.org/zflr.

Footnotes

  • Colonel Richard Bland (1710–1776) served for more than 30 years in Virginia's colonial assembly as a member of the House of Burgesses, representing Prince George County
  • Jefferson is referencing the Haitian Revolution, a 1791 slave uprising against colonial rule by the French.  In 1804, Haiti became a free and independent country.
  • From Virgil's Aeneid, it uses the image of an aging warrior to symbolize his lack of influence.
  • The slave trade was ended in Great Britain in 1807; slavery itself was abolished by Parliament in 1833–34.
  • Galatians 6:9. 

Join Our Community
of Teachers

Teaching American History provides more than just the best programs and resources available for teachers. We provide a vibrant community of practice that is there for you at every stage of your teaching career.

Ideas, resources, & opportunities to engage

Subscribe to our eNewsletter.