Hon. Alexander Stephens, Ga. Vice-President, C.S.A. (c. 1860-1865) National Archives. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/528288

Alexander Stephens and the Corner Stone Speech

ByTAH Staff
On December 14, 2012
Jackie Earle Haley playing Alexander Stephens in Spielberg’s newest movie.

In the newest Spielberg movie, titled Lincoln, the Confederacy’s vice president makes a cameo appearance.  Some of your students may not know much about Alexander Stephens.  After I read a speech he gave in 1861, I decided that was all I ever cared to know about him.  Known as the Cornerstone Speech, this document outlines the reasons for the secession of Stephens’ home state of Georgia and attempts to justify that action.

In the middle of the speech, he happens across a theme that this blog has been concerned with lately: equality.  Lincoln’s view of ad commitment to equality would be given high marks by most modern Americans.  This was an important part of Spielberg’s latest film.  Stephens, however, promotes the old ideas of antebellum racists (the contrast between the two men in Lincoln is striking).

If you want your students to delve into this topic, have them read the Cornerstone Speech.  If you want a shorter version that quickly gets to the heart of the issue of equality, see the excerpt pasted below.  Ask your students to what extent Calhoun (see the previous blog) and Stephens agree.  Ask them to contrast Stephens with Lincoln.  It may even be useful to have discussion on how each man viewed the concept of natural law.

Some context: when Stephens refers to “the new constitution,” he is alluding to the constitution of the newly formed Confederacy.

The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution African slavery as it exists amongst us the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution. Jefferson in his forecast, had anticipated this, as the “rock upon which the old Union would split.” He was right. What was conjecture with him, is now a realized fact. But whether he fully comprehended the great truth upon which that rock stood and stands, may be doubted. The prevailing ideas entertained by him and most of the leading statesmen at the time of the formation of the old constitution, were that the enslavement of the African was in violation of the laws of nature; that it was wrong in principle, socially, morally, and politically. It was an evil they knew not well how to deal with, but the general opinion of the men of that day was that, somehow or other in the order of Providence, the institution would be evanescent and pass away. This idea, though not incorporated in the constitution, was the prevailing idea at that time. The constitution, it is true, secured every essential guarantee to the institution while it should last, and hence no argument can be justly urged against the constitutional guarantees thus secured, because of the common sentiment of the day. Those ideas, however, were fundamentally wrong. They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races. This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the government built upon it fell when the “storm came and the wind blew.”

Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner- stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth. This truth has been slow in the process of its development, like all other truths in the various departments of science. It has been so even amongst us. Many who hear me, perhaps, can recollect well, that this truth was not generally admitted, even within their day. The errors of the past generation still clung to many as late as twenty years ago. Those at the North, who still cling to these errors, with a zeal above knowledge, we justly denominate fanatics. All fanaticism springs from an aberration of the mind from a defect in reasoning. It is a species of insanity. One of the most striking characteristics of insanity, in many instances, is forming correct conclusions from fancied or erroneous premises; so with the anti-slavery fanatics. Their conclusions are right if their premises were. They assume that the negro is equal, and hence conclude that he is entitled to equal privileges and rights with the white man. If their premises were correct, their conclusions would be logical and just but their premise being wrong, their whole argument fails. I recollect once of having heard a gentleman from one of the northern States, of great power and ability, announce in the House of Representatives, with imposing effect, that we of the South would be compelled, ultimately, to yield upon this subject of slavery, that it was as impossible to war successfully against a principle in politics, as it was in physics or mechanics. That the principle would ultimately prevail. That we, in maintaining slavery as it exists with us, were warring against a principle, a principle founded in nature, the principle of the equality of men. The reply I made to him was, that upon his own grounds, we should, ultimately, succeed, and that he and his associates, in this crusade against our institutions, would ultimately fail. The truth announced, that it was as impossible to war successfully against a principle in politics as it was in physics and mechanics, I admitted; but told him that it was he, and those acting with him, who were warring against a principle. They were attempting to make things equal which the Creator had made unequal.

For more resources, check out our CDC volume, Causes of the Civil War, available in our bookstore.


Calhoun and the Declaration of Independence


Congratulations to MAHG Student Nancie Lindblom on Winning Arizona Teacher of the Year!

Join your fellow teachers in exploring America’s history.