/

Collection

Unheard Voices of the Revolution
32
Curated by Melissa Matthes

Introduction

The American Revolution is often narrated through a familiar sequence: resistance to British taxation, the Declaration of Independence, military victory, and the creation of the United States. That story remains essential, but it can make the Revolution appear more unified and inevitable than it was. The documents in this anthology reveal a different Revolution—one experienced through divided families, religious conflict, disease, military hardship, Indigenous diplomacy, espionage, and demands for freedom that the new nation would not fully honor. Together, these sources recover the people, relationships, and unresolved struggles that shaped the revolutionary era. These sources do not offer one alternative story. They reveal many simultaneous revolutions: a struggle for colonial independence, a civil war among families and neighbors, a contest over Indigenous sovereignty, a crisis of slavery, a religious argument, a transformation of gendered responsibilities, and a battle against disease and deprivation. They also demand careful reading. Some voices survive in letters and autobiographies; others appear through treaties, regulations, portraits, or records created by people with greater power. Readers must ask who produced each source, for what audience, under what pressures, and whose experiences remain absent. Recovering overlooked voices does more than make the traditional narrative more inclusive. It changes the questions we ask. Who gained freedom, and who did not? Who bore the costs of independence? How did people understand loyalty, equality, sovereignty, and citizenship? The documents that follow present the American Revolution not as a completed promise, but as a contested transformation whose possibilities and exclusions endured long after the fighting ended. Section I: Social and Cultural Milieu – Homefront The anthology begins on the home front, where political conflict entered private life. The postwar letters between Benjamin Franklin and his Loyalist son William expose the Revolution as a civil war that fractured families as well as a war between Britain and its colonies. The exchanges between John Adams and Abigail Smith about smallpox inoculation, together with George Washington’s order requiring the inoculation of Continental troops, reveal the Revolution as a history of medicine, fear, and collective risk. Section II: Native Americans The Indigenous documents challenge accounts that treat Native peoples as peripheral. The Oneida Declaration of Neutrality, Joseph Brant’s 1776 speech in London, the Treaty of Fort Pitt, and the 1786 effort by a confederation of Native peoples to secure peace present Indigenous nations as diplomatic and political actors pursuing their own interests. They weighed alliances, defended sovereignty, protected trade, and resisted settler expansion. The Haudenosaunee Thanksgiving Address places the conflict within a much older moral and spiritual world. Read beside treaties and speeches, it reminds readers that the Revolution unfolded within Indigenous homelands and disrupted established confederacies, relationships, and systems of governance. Section III: Soldiers, Military, Spies and Prisoners The section on soldiers and spies moves beyond heroic battlefield narratives. Gibson Clough’s journal from the Seven Years’ War reveals the imperial military culture from which the Revolution emerged. Recruiting rules show how armies attempted to transform civilians into soldiers, while Joseph Plumb Martin’s narrative emphasizes hunger, exhaustion, danger, and poor compensation. The Culper Code Book and Washington’s correspondence with Benjamin Tallmadge concerning invisible ink uncover a war conducted through secrecy, coded language, intelligence networks, and uncertain information. Military success depended not only upon generals and battles, but also upon surveillance, improvisation, and the endurance of ordinary people.  Section IV: Religion Religion was not merely a backdrop to the Revolution but one of the principal languages through which Americans interpreted political authority, moral obligation, and historical change. Jacob Duché’s prayer before the Continental Congress and his later letter urging Washington to abandon the cause illustrate how easily patriot unity could fracture. Sermons by John Witherspoon and Samuel Langdon interpreted resistance through providence, virtue, and fears of corruption. Loyalist sermons by Jonathan Boucher and Charles Inglis defended obedience, monarchy, and established authority. A Loyalist rebuttal to Thomas Paine’s Common Sense further demonstrates that independence was neither obvious nor universally accepted. Religious language supplied arguments both for rebellion and against it. Revolutionary religion did not produce a single political position; it furnished competing interpretive frameworks through which both Patriots and Loyalists claimed divine sanction for their visions of authority and social order. Section V: Women The writings of women reveal political participation beyond formal officeholding. Mercy Otis Warren’s letters to Abigail and John Adams place women within networks of political commentary and mobilization. Mary Smith Cranch’s observations show women interpreting the uncertain postwar republic, while accounts from South Carolina describe the vulnerability and resilience of women under military occupation. Deborah Sampson’s address recounting her Continental Army service challenges conventional boundaries between soldiering and womanhood. Section VI: African Americans The African American sources expose the Revolution’s deepest contradiction. Lord Dunmore’s Proclamation offered freedom to enslaved people who fled rebel masters and joined the British, making slavery a central military issue. Boston King’s account reveals the hopes and displacement of Black Loyalists, while Venture Smith’s narrative records the violence of enslavement and the struggle to claim one’s labor and life. Benjamin Banneker’s letter confronts Thomas Jefferson with the incompatibility of revolutionary liberty and racial slavery. Jefferson’s writings on race reveal the prejudice that coexisted with universal claims about equality.

Documents

Ideas, resources, & opportunities to engage

Subscribe to our eNewsletter.