Letter from Edmund Randolph to David Shepherd (1787)

Compare this letter to the one Randolph wrote on June 6. Has Randolph's tone toward the Convention proceedings changed or remained consistent? If it has changed, how? If it has stayed the same, why? Consider the events of the Convention that occurred between the two letters.
Why does Randolph assume that the public might be "anxious to be informed of the proceedings of the Convention"? Considering that this letter was written exactly two months after the official start of the Convention, what factors might have contributed to this growing public interest?

“Edmund Randolph to David Shepherd,” July 25, 1787. In Supplement to Max Farrand's The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, edited by James H. Hutson. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987.https://consource.org/document/edmund-randolph-to-david-shepherd-1787-7-25/20130122080503/.


Dear Sir,1

. . . I presume that your part of the world, like this city [is] anxious to be informed of the proceedings of the Convention. It would give me pleasure to contribute to the gratification of the friends of the united states. But we are not yet discharged from the obligation of secrecy. This much I can only tell you that we have been employed in settling general principles of government and yesterday a committee was appointed to prepare a constitution conformable to those principles. Our western friends, beyond the Allegheny, may be assured that we shall not be unmindful of their interests in our regulations.

Footnotes
  1. 1. David Shepherd (1734–1795), a Revolutionary War patriot who personally knew Washington.
Teacher Programs

Conversation-based seminars for collegial PD, one-day and multi-day seminars, graduate credit seminars (MA degree), online and in-person.

Coming soon! World War I & the 1920s!